🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.